Which of the following techniques is NOT used to organize an After Action Review (AAR)?

The technique that is not typically used to organize an After Action Review (AAR) is centered around team member performance reviews. In an AAR, the primary focus is on the events and actions that transpired during the operation rather than individual evaluations of team members.

AARs are designed to reflect on and assess what occurred during a mission or exercise, facilitating a collective learning experience rather than a personal critique. Organizing the review by chronological events allows participants to discuss the sequence of actions and decisions, while organizing by war-fighting functions helps align the discussion with specific operational capabilities. Key events are also crucial for highlighting significant moments that impacted the operation's outcome. Hence, focusing on team member performance reviews diverges from the fundamental objectives of an AAR, which are to improve processes and outcomes on a collective level.